This is a Georgia news story, published by ABC News, that relates primarily to the State Election Board news.
For more Georgia news, you can click here:
more Georgia newsFor more Us federal elections news, you can click here:
more Us federal elections newsFor more news from ABC News, you can click here:
more news from ABC NewsOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us federal elections, you might also like this article about
election certification. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Georgia statutes news, Georgia law news, news about Us federal elections, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
county election officialsABC News
•
83% Informative
New rules regarding election certification in Georgia to get test in court this week .
Two controversial new rules concerning the certification of vote tallies are set to face their first test.
The Republican majority on the State Election Board voted to approve the rules last month .
Democrats filed a legal challenge and argue the rules could be used “to upend the statutorily required process for certifying election results in Georgia .
Lawyers for the Republican groups say prohibiting the enforcement of the new rules “in the final weeks before voting starts would inject judicially created confusion,” which the Supreme Court ruling meant to protect against. Lawyers for the Democrats say the ruling applies to federal courts, not state courts, to keep federal courts from intruding in a matter having to do with state laws. Even if it did apply in this case, they contend, it would support their arguments because it argues against longstanding election rules being changed close to an election..
VR Score
87
Informative language
87
Neutral language
58
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
68
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
8
Source diversity
1
Affiliate links
no affiliate links