CBS Skips Fact-Checking Debate
This is a news story, published by Mother Jones, that relates primarily to Vance news.
Vance news
For more Vance news, you can click here:
more Vance newsNews about Us campaigns & elections
For more Us campaigns & elections news, you can click here:
more Us campaigns & elections newsMother Jones news
For more news from Mother Jones, you can click here:
more news from Mother JonesAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us campaigns & elections, you might also like this article about
many debate viewers. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest minute debate news, ABC News moderators Linsey Davis news, news about Us campaigns & elections, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
presidential debateMother Jones
•CBS moderators won’t fact-check the VP debate
71% Informative
CBS will not point out the candidates’ inaccuracies during the vice presidential debate.
The network’s plan garnered extensive, immediate criticism from reporters and press watchers alike.
Some journalists accused CBS of failing to live up to its mission, while others charged that they were bowing to Trump 's camp.
But even without these answers, critics of CBS have a point, considering that Vance also has an extensive record of flat-out lying.
VR Score
70
Informative language
64
Neutral language
50
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
57
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
9
Source diversity
5
Affiliate links
no affiliate links