Elastic Abandons Open Source Licenses
This is a news story, published by TechCrunch, that relates primarily to Elasticsearch news.
Elasticsearch news
For more Elasticsearch news, you can click here:
more Elasticsearch newstech industry trends news
For more tech industry trends news, you can click here:
more tech industry trends newsTechCrunch news
For more news from TechCrunch, you can click here:
more news from TechCrunchAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best tech news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like tech industry trends news, you might also like this article about
Elasticsearch license. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Elasticsearch brand news, Amazon Elasticsearch news, tech industry trends news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
proprietary Elastic licenseTechCrunch
•Elastic founder on why they returned to open source 4 years after going proprietary | TechCrunch
73% Informative
Elastic, the $8 billion company behind Elasticsearch and Kibana , has gone open source once again.
The company switched to a proprietary "source available" license four years ago .
The move goes against a trend that has seen countless companies ditch open source altogether.
In 2021 , Elastic moved to closed source licenses after several years of conflict with Amazon ’s cloud subsidiary.
Elastic says it's hoping to work with the OSI toward creating a new license.
The perfect license, according to Banon , is one that sits “somewhere between AGPL and SSPL” Banon says that simply being able to call itself “open source” again is good enough.
VR Score
66
Informative language
59
Neutral language
35
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
52
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
medium-lived
External references
16
Source diversity
8
Affiliate links
no affiliate links