This is a U.S. news story, published by MSN, that relates primarily to Social Security news.
For more U.S. news, you can click here:
more U.S. newsFor more personal finance & financial education news, you can click here:
more personal finance & financial education newsFor more news from MSN, you can click here:
more news from MSNOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best business news, entertainment news, world news, and much more. If you like personal finance & financial education news, you might also like this article about
Social Security Fairness Act. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Social Security rules news, Government Pension Offset news, personal finance & financial education news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Social Security reformMoneywise
•
83% Informative
A bipartisan group of U.S. lawmakers is pushing to repeal a set of Social Security rules that reduce Social Security benefits for those who also receive pension income from certain public service jobs.
The proposed legislation would erase the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP) and the Government Pension Offset ( GPO ) The WEP is believed to reduce benefits for about 2 million Americans , while the GPO rule affects about 800,000 Americans .
Critics say the provisions disproportionately affect public sector professionals who dedicated their careers to service.
VR Score
85
Informative language
83
Neutral language
66
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
67
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
12
Source diversity
3
Affiliate links
no affiliate links