This is a news story, published by Yahoo, that relates primarily to Congress news.
For more tech giants news, you can click here:
more tech giants newsFor more news from Yahoo, you can click here:
more news from YahooOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best tech news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like tech giants news, you might also like this article about
Image Based Sexual Abuse. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest sexual abuse material news, revenge porn news, tech giants news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
inappropriate nude imagesHome
•78% Informative
The White House announced voluntary commitments to curb image-based sexual abuse.
Congress has failed to pass meaningful tech policy in the past two decades .
Experts and advocates are skeptical of self-regulation without an official mechanism for accountability.
Congress continues to call on Congress to pass tech legislation that will protect everyone.
There is a tension between regulating to offset harms while allowing room for innovation.
Many times, tech companies adhere to regulations via overcompliance or cutting off access to their product completely.
Critics of voluntary commitments have many ready examples to inform their skepticism.
There is no enforcement mechanism, and there are few resources devoted to following up on these commitments.
VR Score
77
Informative language
74
Neutral language
48
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
63
Offensive language
likely offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
23
Source diversity
16
Affiliate links
no affiliate links