This is a Arizona news story, published by MSN, that relates primarily to Lea Marquez Peterson news.
For more Arizona news, you can click here:
more Arizona newsFor more Lea Marquez Peterson news, you can click here:
more Lea Marquez Peterson newsFor more energy & natural resources news, you can click here:
more energy & natural resources newsFor more news from MSN, you can click here:
more news from MSNOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best business news, entertainment news, world news, and much more. If you like energy & natural resources news, you might also like this article about
Arizona Corporation Commission candidate debate. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Arizona Corporation Commission news, Arizona Public Service news, energy & natural resources news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Arizona Clean Election CommissionThe Arizona Republic
•
88% Informative
Candidates vying for three seats on Arizona 's utility-regulatory panel sparred on energy policy.
Democrats attacked the current Republican -dominated Arizona Corporation Commission for allowing electricity bills to increase.
Republicans including Lea Marquez Peterson said the commission sliced APS ' funding request by more than $200 million from what was requested.
Republicans hold a 4 -1 edge currently on the comisssion.
Reach the writer at [email protected]. This article originally appeared on Arizona Republic: Energy bills, solar power dominate Arizona Corporation Commission candidate debate.
VR Score
92
Informative language
92
Neutral language
76
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
68
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
6
Source diversity
2
Affiliate links
no affiliate links