Republicans Dislike Project 2025
This is a news story, published by Mother Jones, that relates primarily to NBC news.
News about Us federal elections
For more Us federal elections news, you can click here:
more Us federal elections newsMother Jones news
For more news from Mother Jones, you can click here:
more news from Mother JonesAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us federal elections, you might also like this article about
negative views. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest positive views news, MAGA Republicans news, news about Us federal elections, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Trump campaignMother Jones
•Poll: Only 7 percent of GOP voters like Project 2025
65% Informative
NBC poll: Only 7 percent of Republicans have positive views of extremist guidebook Project 2025 .
Among die-hard Trump fans, or self-described “MAGA Republicans ,” the results were not much better: Only 9 percent of them reported positive views, while 28 percent held negative views.
Democrats have been successfully running on the dangers Project 2025 poses.
VR Score
63
Informative language
58
Neutral language
17
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
53
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
possibly hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
9
Source diversity
9
Affiliate links
no affiliate links