This is a New York news story, published by Law & Crime, that relates primarily to Letitia James news.
For more New York news, you can click here:
more New York newsFor more Letitia James news, you can click here:
more Letitia James newsFor more SCOTUS news, you can click here:
more SCOTUS newsFor more news from Law & Crime, you can click here:
more news from Law & CrimeOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about SCOTUS, you might also like this article about
New York Supreme Court. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest earlier appeals court decision news, appellate brief news, news about SCOTUS, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
New York Attorney General Letitia JamesLaw & Crime
•
73% Informative
At the heart of the appeal is an allegation the trial court violated the law by allowing New York Attorney General Letitia James to bring time-barred claims against Trump and his namesake family business.
Trump argued the lower court allowed James to go after her avowed political enemy for violations that “do not exist at all” The attorney general’s office, in response, argued there was “overwhelming evidence” the Trump Organization “acted with an intent to defraud”.
Just one of the judges sitting on the five -judge panel appeared conciliatory to the broad mandate contained in the statute used by the attorney general’s office.
But even this judge appeared hesitant to agree that the banks in question suffered any harm.
The judges drilled down on the idea that the major counter-party, Deutsche Bank , dealt with, similar such applications all the time.
VR Score
76
Informative language
73
Neutral language
73
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
50
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
2
Source diversity
2
Affiliate links
no affiliate links