Russia's Nuclear Deterrence Amendment Criticized
This is a Russia news story, published by MSN, that relates primarily to Vladimir Putin news.
Russia news
For more Russia news, you can click here:
more Russia newsVladimir Putin news
For more Vladimir Putin news, you can click here:
more Vladimir Putin newsNews about Us involvement in foreign conflicts
For more Us involvement in foreign conflicts news, you can click here:
more Us involvement in foreign conflicts newsMSN news
For more news from MSN, you can click here:
more news from MSNAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us involvement in foreign conflicts, you might also like this article about
current nuclear doctrine. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Putin decree news, nuclear deterrence doctrine news, news about Us involvement in foreign conflicts, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
nuclear retaliationDW
•US, EU, Ukraine slam Russia's nuclear deterrence doctrine
65% Informative
Russian President Vladimir Putin proposes update to Russia 's nuclear deterrence doctrine.
The update would consider a "massive" aerial attack on Russia supported by a nuclear state as a "joint attack," even if the attacker is a non-nuclear state.
US Secretary of State Antony Blinken and European Union foreign policy spokesman Peter Stano reject the proposal.
VR Score
68
Informative language
67
Neutral language
66
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
56
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links