Nuclear Compensation Bill Stalled
This is a Guam news story, published by MSN, that relates primarily to Mike Johnson news.
Guam news
For more Guam news, you can click here:
more Guam newsMike Johnson news
For more Mike Johnson news, you can click here:
more Mike Johnson newsNews about civil rights activism
For more civil rights activism news, you can click here:
more civil rights activism newsMSN news
For more news from MSN, you can click here:
more news from MSNAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about civil rights activism, you might also like this article about
Radiation Exposure Compensation Act. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest radiation treatment news, nuclear program news, news about civil rights activism, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
nuclear victim compensation billRoll Call
•Advocates urge vote on nuclear victim compensation bill
80% Informative
Advocates urge Speaker Mike Johnson to hold a vote on a Senate -passed bill from Sen. Josh Hawley , R-Mo., contending that the bill would easily pass if brought to the House .
The bill would expand claims to a greater number of “downwinders” and open the fund to Guam and veterans who handled waste in the Marshall Islands .
The Congressional Budget Office estimated in 2023 that the expanded compensation fund would cost the government $147.1 billion over 10 years .
VR Score
85
Informative language
84
Neutral language
68
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
53
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
2
Source diversity
1
Affiliate links
no affiliate links