Sarmat missile launch fails
This is a Russia news story, published by Ars Technica.
Russia news
For more Russia news, you can click here:
more Russia newsNews about Us involvement in foreign conflicts
For more Us involvement in foreign conflicts news, you can click here:
more Us involvement in foreign conflicts newsArs Technica news
For more news from Ars Technica, you can click here:
more news from Ars TechnicaAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us involvement in foreign conflicts, you might also like this article about
Sarmat missile silo. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest previous Sarmat missile tests news, missile launch news, news about Us involvement in foreign conflicts, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Sarmat missileArs Technica
•Satellite images suggest test of Russian “super weapon” failed spectacularly
84% Informative
Commercial satellite imagery shows a crater centered on the opening to the Sarmat missile silo.
The ICBM is Russia 's largest ICBM, capable of delivering nuclear warheads to targets more than 11,000 miles away.
This is at least the second time an RS-28 missile has failed in less than two years .
Russia issued warnings last week for pilots to keep out of airspace along the flight path.
VR Score
84
Informative language
81
Neutral language
82
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
61
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
8
Source diversity
4
Affiliate links
no affiliate links