This is a news story, published by The Hill, that relates primarily to Trump news.
For more Trump news, you can click here:
more Trump newsFor more SCOTUS news, you can click here:
more SCOTUS newsFor more news from The Hill, you can click here:
more news from The HillOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about SCOTUS, you might also like this article about
Unprecedented Immunity Decision. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest prosecution news, presidential duties news, news about SCOTUS, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
election interference prosecutionThe Hill
•64% Informative
The Supreme Court ruled in July that presidents are immune from prosecution for any actions they take as part of their constitutional responsibilities.
Democrats want voters to take the decision into account this fall when they cast ballots for president.
Republicans see the decision as hindering what they describe as politically motivated prosecutions of former President Trump .
Mukasey says critics of the decision have “a complete lack of common sense” Sen. Peter Welch (D-Vt.) said the hypothetical “really diminishes the importance” of the conversation.
Welch said the rule of law is being “whittled away” and that the checks and balances that are the core of our constitutional system.
VR Score
74
Informative language
77
Neutral language
42
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
64
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links