ChatGPT Memory Vulnerability Fix
This is a OpenAI news story, published by Ars Technica, that relates primarily to Johann Rehberger news.
OpenAI news
For more OpenAI news, you can click here:
more OpenAI newsJohann Rehberger news
For more Johann Rehberger news, you can click here:
more Johann Rehberger newsNews about Ai research
For more Ai research news, you can click here:
more Ai research newsArs Technica news
For more news from Ars Technica, you can click here:
more news from Ars TechnicaAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best tech news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Ai research, you might also like this article about
term conversation memory. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest memory lane news, previous conversations news, news about Ai research, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
future conversationsArs Technica
•Hacker plants false memories in ChatGPT to steal user data in perpetuity
75% Informative
Security researcher Johann Rehberger recently reported a vulnerability in ChatGPT that allowed attackers to store false information.
The vulnerability abused long-term conversation memory, a feature OpenAI began testing in February and made more broadly available in September .
A fix has been introduced that prevents memories from being abused as an exfiltration vector.
VR Score
71
Informative language
67
Neutral language
58
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
60
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
medium-lived
External references
3
Source diversity
2
Affiliate links
no affiliate links