Trump's Electoral College Push Fails
This is a Nebraska news story, published by The Bulwark, that relates primarily to Deb Fischer news.
Nebraska news
For more Nebraska news, you can click here:
more Nebraska newsDeb Fischer news
For more Deb Fischer news, you can click here:
more Deb Fischer newsNews about Us federal elections
For more Us federal elections news, you can click here:
more Us federal elections newsThe Bulwark news
For more news from The Bulwark, you can click here:
more news from The BulwarkAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us federal elections, you might also like this article about
Top Nebraska Republican. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Electoral College votes news, Electoral College Vote news, news about Us federal elections, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Electoral College changeThe Bulwark
•Nebraska Sen. Deb Fischer says Trump-led push to make the state a winner-take-all state is dead
63% Informative
Sen. Deb Fischer says the effort to make Nebraska a winner-take-all state is dead.
Trump and his team had been putting pressure on GOP lawmakers to scrap the current system.
One of the key lawmakers, State Sen. Mike McDonnell , announced on Monday that he would not back the change.
VR Score
66
Informative language
69
Neutral language
37
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
50
Offensive language
likely offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
3
Source diversity
3
Affiliate links
no affiliate links