Telegram Expands Data Collection
This is a news story, published by New York Post, that relates primarily to Telegram news.
News about Us crime, violence, terrorism & cybercrime
For more Us crime, violence, terrorism & cybercrime news, you can click here:
more Us crime, violence, terrorism & cybercrime newsNew York Post news
For more news from New York Post, you can click here:
more news from New York PostAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us crime, violence, terrorism & cybercrime, you might also like this article about
Telegram users. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Telegram channel news, Telegram post news, news about Us crime, violence, terrorism & cybercrime, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
TelegramNew York Post
•Telegram CEO Pavel Durov capitulates, says app will hand over user data to governments to stop criminals
60% Informative
Telegram quietly removed language from its “frequently asked questions” page which said that “we do not process any requests related to them” The move is a departure from Telegram ’s previous policies, which often gave short shrift to government requests for user data.
Critics claim Telegram is the preferred method of communication for criminal organizations engaged in a range of illegal activity.
VR Score
56
Informative language
51
Neutral language
65
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
66
Offensive language
likely offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links