This is a news story, published by Navy Lookout, that relates primarily to The Type 31 Design Authority news.
For more emerging technologies news, you can click here:
more emerging technologies newsFor more news from Navy Lookout, you can click here:
more news from Navy LookoutOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best tech news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like emerging technologies news, you might also like this article about
good warship design. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest RN Frigate news, warship news, emerging technologies news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
purpose frigateNavy Lookout
•88% Informative
The Type 31 frigate has been designed from the outset to minimise crew numbers.
Although based on a parent design, Type 31 differs significantly and meets a completely new set of naval standards.
Type 31 will have a ship’s company of around 110 sailors but will be able to sustain combat operations through increased levels of automation.
The Type 31 Design Authority compiled the complement plan and presented to the RN through Operability Working Groups .
These groups held multiple sessions with representatives from different branches ( Warfare, Logistics , etc.) and sub-branches (Communications & Information Specialists) scrutinising the validity of the complement and the functionality of the advanced technologies used on the Type 31.
VR Score
90
Informative language
91
Neutral language
56
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
65
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
long-living
External references
4
Source diversity
4
Affiliate links
no affiliate links