This is a news story, published by Medium, that relates primarily to David Cameron news.
For more David Cameron news, you can click here:
more David Cameron newsFor more United kingdom politics news, you can click here:
more United kingdom politics newsFor more news from Medium, you can click here:
more news from MediumOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best world news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about United kingdom politics, you might also like this article about
muscular liberalism. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest liberal democracies news, democratisation news, news about United kingdom politics, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
democratisation underminesMedium
•75% Informative
Some Western democracies have pursued policies that appear to suppress or re-engineer certain viewpoints through overt and covert means.
This process involves using state power not merely to protect society from genuine threats but also to impose a certain set of values, beliefs, and ideologies.
David Cameron has been one of the most vocal cheerleaders of forced democratisation.
David Cameron’s call for muscular liberalism’ finds a natural extension in the pursuit of nonviolent extremism, writes Andrew Hammond .
Hammond: In a truly free society, the state should defend the right of individuals to think and speak freely, even when those ideas are unpopular or dangerous.
Hammond says this approach risks criminalising thought and imposing a uniform ideological vision that stifles diversity.
The pursuit of nonviolent extremism allows governments to shape the ideological landscape, suppressing ideas that challenge the status quo.
This suppression of dissent can gradually erode the robustness of democratic debate, narrowing the range of permissible ideas and homogenising political discourse.
Amnesty International pointed out these dangers in its recent report on the Prevent program, This Is The Thought Police .
VR Score
72
Informative language
68
Neutral language
38
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
80
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
long-living
External references
15
Source diversity
10
Affiliate links
no affiliate links