McCrossen-Nethercott Sues CPS
This is a news story, published by Guardian, that relates primarily to McCrossen-Nethercott news.
McCrossen-Nethercott news
For more McCrossen-Nethercott news, you can click here:
more McCrossen-Nethercott newsNews about civil rights activism
For more civil rights activism news, you can click here:
more civil rights activism newsGuardian news
For more news from Guardian, you can click here:
more news from GuardianAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about civil rights activism, you might also like this article about
defendant. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest prosecutorial discretion news, defendants news, news about civil rights activism, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
guilty verdictGuardian
•An empty apology from the CPS? That’s no justice for rape victims | Vera Baird
74% Informative
Jade McCrossen-Nethercott successfully sued the Crown Prosecution Service for refusing to prosecute the man she says raped her.
Days before the trial, prosecutors told her they were dropping her case.
She disagreed and invoked her victims’ right to review (VRR) to challenge the decision.
The CPS ’s appeal and review unit agreed that the defendant ought to have been prosecuted.
VR Score
75
Informative language
75
Neutral language
25
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
43
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
2
Source diversity
2
Affiliate links
no affiliate links