This is a news story, published by CNN, that relates primarily to The Supreme Court news.
For more SCOTUS news, you can click here:
more SCOTUS newsFor more news from CNN, you can click here:
more news from CNNOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about SCOTUS, you might also like this article about
Affordable Care Act. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Obamacare news, healthcare protections news, news about SCOTUS, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
preventive care coverage mandatesCNN
•
76% Informative
The Supreme Court is being asked again to consider the Affordable Care Act with a challenge to the law’s mandates for no-cost preventive care coverage.
Lower courts ruled partially in favor of the plaintiffs, deeming some of the mandates unconstitutional and putting in jeopardy cost-free coverage of certain services, including several cancer screenings and a popular heart medication.
The case puts a pre-election spotlight on how conservative assault on the law has not ended even if the political will to repeal it has mostly dissipated.
The request for Supreme Court review comes after the high court has issued other recent rulings dealing with executive branch authority.
A 5th Circuit panel said in June that some of the no-cost preventive care coverage mandates were unconstitutional because the members of the task force recommended them were the sort of “principal officers” that should have been appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate .
VR Score
79
Informative language
78
Neutral language
63
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
72
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
1
Source diversity
1
Affiliate links
no affiliate links