This is a U.S. news story, published by Home, that relates primarily to Mirror, Mirror news.
For more U.S. news, you can click here:
more U.S. newsFor more health policy news, you can click here:
more health policy newsFor more news from Home, you can click here:
more news from HomeOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best health news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about health policy, you might also like this article about
Commonwealth Fund International Health Policy Surveys. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest International Health Policy Survey news, Mirror news, news about health policy, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Commonwealth Fund International Health Policy SurveyHome
•82% Informative
Mirror, Mirror is unique in its heavy reliance on survey measures designed to capture the perspectives of patients and professionals.
Nearly three-quarters of the report’s measures are derived from patient or physician reports of health system performance.
Survey data are drawn from Commonwealth Fund International Health Policy Surveys fielded during 2021 , 2022 , and 2023 .
Measures related to wait times that were excluded from the 2021 report were added back to this edition.
Method for calculating performance scores and rankings is similar to that used in 2021 and 2017 reports.
We modified the calculation of relative performance because the U.S. was a distinct and substantial outlier.
The U.S. was excluded from the calculation of each country’s overall performance score.
Australia , the Netherlands , and the United Kingdom were nearly always ranked among the three top countries.
These results suggest that the selected ranking method was not highly sensitive to the choice of indicators.
VR Score
93
Informative language
100
Neutral language
58
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
73
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
long-living
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links