Vance Criticizes Immigrants' Legal Status
This is a Springfield news story, published by The New Republic, that relates primarily to Vance news.
Springfield news
For more Springfield news, you can click here:
more Springfield newsVance news
For more Vance news, you can click here:
more Vance newsNews about Us federal policies
For more Us federal policies news, you can click here:
more Us federal policies newsThe New Republic news
For more news from The New Republic, you can click here:
more news from The New RepublicAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us federal policies, you might also like this article about
deportation. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest deport news, inhumane immigration policies news, news about Us federal policies, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
legal immigrationThe New Republic
•J.D. Vance’s Fascist Threat Against All Immigrants—“Illegal” or Not
64% Informative
J.D. Vance said Wednesday that even those here legally are in fact “illegal” and subject to deportation.
A reporter asked Vance about the Haitian immigrants in Springfield , Ohio , whom he falsely accused of killing and eating pets.
Vance 's response was that he still considered them illegal, calling the question “a media and Kamala Harris fact-check”.
VR Score
62
Informative language
57
Neutral language
8
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
51
Offensive language
likely offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
83
Source diversity
33
Affiliate links
no affiliate links