This is a Missouri news story, published by PBS, that relates primarily to The St. Louis NAACP news.
For more Missouri news, you can click here:
more Missouri newsFor more civil rights activism news, you can click here:
more civil rights activism newsFor more news from PBS, you can click here:
more news from PBSOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about civil rights activism, you might also like this article about
Low literacy voters. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Black students news, literacy crisis news, news about civil rights activism, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
low literacy ratesPBS
•
69% Informative
The St. Louis NAACP is asking the federal government to help mitigate the “literacy crisis” Black students are facing in the classroom.
Forty percent of Missouri ’s fourth graders tested in 2022 were below a basic level of skill in reading.
Low adult literacy levels could cost the economy as much as $2.2 trillion a year .
130 million adults in the nation, or 54 percent between 16 and 74 years old , have low literacy skills.
This means people are reading below the equivalent of a sixth -grade level.
Despite higher high school graduation rates, 23 percent of adults still struggle to read, ProPublica reported in 2022 .
VR Score
80
Informative language
86
Neutral language
24
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
43
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links