This is a C++ news story, published by The Register, that relates primarily to Achilles news.
For more C++ news, you can click here:
more C++ newsFor more Achilles news, you can click here:
more Achilles newsFor more software applications news, you can click here:
more software applications newsFor more news from The Register, you can click here:
more news from The RegisterOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best tech news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like software applications news, you might also like this article about
safe programming languages. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest memory safety features news, memory safety flaws news, software applications news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
memory safety initiativeThe Register
•83% Informative
The C++ community has published a proposal to help developers write less vulnerable code.
The Safe C++ Extensions proposal aims to address C++ 's Achilles ' heel, the challenge of ensuring that code is free of memory safety bugs.
Public sector has been pushing programmers to write new applications and rewrite old ones in memory safe languages like C#, Go, Java , Python, and Swift .
The Safe C++ project adds new technology for ensuring memory safety for C++ applications.
It includes compile-time intelligence like borrow checking to prevent use-after-free bugs.
The aim is to provide the same soundness guarantees as Rust at a lower cost.
The next step, Baxter said, involves greater participation from industry to help realize the project.
VR Score
83
Informative language
82
Neutral language
54
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
64
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
medium-lived
External references
11
Source diversity
8
Affiliate links
no affiliate links