This is a U.S. news story, published by Wired, that relates primarily to DAC news.
For more U.S. news, you can click here:
more U.S. newsFor more climate change news, you can click here:
more climate change newsFor more news from Wired, you can click here:
more news from WiredOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best science news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like climate change news, you might also like this article about
carbon capture industry. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest carbon removal industry news, carbon capture news, climate change news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
carbon capture projectsWired
•
84% Informative
The U.S. has become the go-to location for companies seeking to suck carbon dioxide out of the sky.
The projects in Louisiana and Texas are supported by up to $1.05 billion in Department of Energy funds.
But a Heritage Foundation policy blueprint for a second Trump presidency would roll back policies that support the DAC industry.
Most of the DAC industry experts thought there was little political appetite to reverse the 45Q tax credit.
They were more worried about the prospect that existing DOE funds set aside for DAC and other projects might not be allocated under a future administration.
Without government support, the private sector would never develop technologies like DAC .
VR Score
86
Informative language
84
Neutral language
85
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
55
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
medium-lived
External references
5
Affiliate links
no affiliate links