This is a U.S. news story, published by Wired, that relates primarily to Lenhart news.
For more U.S. news, you can click here:
more U.S. newsFor more Lenhart news, you can click here:
more Lenhart newsFor more Ai policy and regulations news, you can click here:
more Ai policy and regulations newsFor more news from Wired, you can click here:
more news from WiredOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best tech news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Ai policy and regulations, you might also like this article about
AI adoption. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest generative AI tools news, AI tools news, news about Ai policy and regulations, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
AI useWired
•
80% Informative
New research reveals what AI tools teenagers in the U.S. are using, and how often, as well as how little their parents know about it.
The most common reason for using AI was school-related; more than half reported using it for “homework help,” primarily in “brainstorming ideas” The survey indicates that US teenagers are embracing AI at pace with peers in the UK .
“I’m sympathetic to administrators and teachers who don’t know what to do, but we can see in the data that it’s critical to start talking about this,” Lenhart says. “You cannot shove it to the side and hope that it goes away.”.
VR Score
86
Informative language
93
Neutral language
57
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
54
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
3
Source diversity
3
Affiliate links
no affiliate links