Human Knee Evolution Misunderstood
This is a news story, published by Live Science, that relates primarily to Michael Berthaume news.
Michael Berthaume news
For more Michael Berthaume news, you can click here:
more Michael Berthaume newsbiology news
For more biology news, you can click here:
more biology newsLive Science news
For more news from Live Science, you can click here:
more news from Live ScienceAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best science news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like biology news, you might also like this article about
human knee. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest knee osteoarthritis news, knee problems news, biology news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
human knees todayLive Science
•Human knees kind of suck — here's why we haven't evolved better ones
78% Informative
The knee has undergone major changes to its size and shape to allow early humans to walk upright.
The knee is an intricate piece of biological machinery that scientists don't fully understand.
New research has shown that two of these often misunderstood bones, the medial and lateral fabellae, which are behind the knee, could have evolved in multiple ways in primates.
Dr Michael Berthaume is a Reader in the Department of Engineering at King’s College London .
He was at London South Bank University where he was Deputy Head of the Division , in charge of Research and Enterprise .
He is a fellow of the Royal Anthropological Institute and member of the Exceed Research Network .
VR Score
88
Informative language
91
Neutral language
59
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
50
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
long-living
External references
8
Source diversity
7