This is a news story, published by The National, that relates primarily to Rachel Reeves' news.
For more Rachel Reeves' news, you can click here:
more Rachel Reeves' newsFor more United kingdom politics news, you can click here:
more United kingdom politics newsFor more news from The National, you can click here:
more news from The NationalOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best world news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about United kingdom politics, you might also like this article about
PUBLIC favourability. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Labour voters news, lowest net negativity news, news about United kingdom politics, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
favourabilityThe National
•77% Informative
32% of people view the Prime Minister favourably, a six -percentage point drop since August .
Those who view Starmer unfavourably increased by eight points to 46% over the same period .
Rachel Reeves' favourability has also fallen by nine points to 44% in September .
The percentage who view the Chancellor unfavourable matches the highest level of negativity previously recorded for him.
VR Score
88
Informative language
93
Neutral language
68
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
56
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links