This is a news story, published by Salt Lake City Tribune, that relates primarily to Mike Schultz news.
For more Mike Schultz news, you can click here:
more Mike Schultz newsFor more Us campaigns & elections news, you can click here:
more Us campaigns & elections newsFor more news from Salt Lake City Tribune, you can click here:
more news from Salt Lake City TribuneOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us campaigns & elections, you might also like this article about
Utah Constitution. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest constitutional Amendment news, ballot initiative news, news about Us campaigns & elections, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Utah LegislatureSalt Lake City Tribune
•76% Informative
Utah Legislature asks Supreme Court to put constitutional Amendment D on the ballot.
Amendment D would guarantee the Legislature the right to repeal citizen ballot initiatives.
A judge ruled Thursday that the proposal was “void” due to deceptive ballot language.
Lawmakers also failed to abide by a constitutional requirement that they publish the text of the proposed amendment in newspapers.
Instead of nonpartisan legislative attorneys writing how the question would appear on the ballot, Republican lawmakers changed the law earlier this year to allow House Speaker Mike Schultz and Senate President Stuart Adams to craft the language — resulting in the wording that Gibson said was so deceptive she enjoined it from moving forward. “Without transparent, accurate and complete disclosure about the amendments, there can be no meaningful right to vote,” the judge wrote..
VR Score
80
Informative language
81
Neutral language
30
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
73
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
2
Source diversity
1
Affiliate links
no affiliate links