This is a news story, published by The New Republic, that relates primarily to Julian Zelizer news.
For more Julian Zelizer news, you can click here:
more Julian Zelizer newsFor more Us political corruption news, you can click here:
more Us political corruption newsFor more news from The New Republic, you can click here:
more news from The New RepublicOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us political corruption, you might also like this article about
political media. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest political press news, media critics news, news about Us political corruption, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
sanewashing conversationThe New Republic
•
70% Informative
Julian Zelizer : Some have accused the political press of having a “coherence bias’s” tendency to tidy up Donald Trump's constant barrage of nonsense.
He says recent attempts in the mainstream media to understand and explain wonky matters have been embarrassing failures.
Zelizer says the media's grasp of policy is commensurate with its constant demand for it.
A New York Times article about the candidates' housing proposals was edited out of existence.
The idea that a mass deportation plan would play a role comes bull-rushing into the discussion without warning and without any explanation of how it would work.
I’m glad that the press is taking Trump both literally and seriously, but no one can look seriously at the literal details of his “proposals” and conclude they make any sense.
VR Score
70
Informative language
66
Neutral language
34
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
56
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
173
Source diversity
58
Affiliate links
no affiliate links