Shapps Criticises Starmer on Missiles
This is a Washington news story, published by Telegraph, that relates primarily to Putin news.
Washington news
For more Washington news, you can click here:
more Washington newsPutin news
For more Putin news, you can click here:
more Putin newsNews about United kingdom politics
For more United kingdom politics news, you can click here:
more United kingdom politics newsTelegraph news
For more news from Telegraph, you can click here:
more news from TelegraphAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best world news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about United kingdom politics, you might also like this article about
appalling Russian attacks. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest president Zelensky news, former defence secretary news, news about United kingdom politics, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
PutinTelegraph
•Starmer is ‘playing into Putin’s hands’ over Storm Shadow permission delay, says Grant Shapps
59% Informative
Grant Shapps accused Sir Keir Starmer of playing into Putin ’s hands’ by delaying decision on missiles.
Sir Ben Wallace said the tug of war’ over the use of the missiles would embolden Putin .
Sir Keier flew to Washington and held intensive talks with Joe Biden on Friday to discuss permission to use the Storm Shadow missiles.
VR Score
63
Informative language
63
Neutral language
36
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
54
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links