This is a Michigan news story, published by Christian Science Monitor, that relates primarily to Bipartisan Infrastructure Law news.
For more Michigan news, you can click here:
more Michigan newsFor more Us federal policies news, you can click here:
more Us federal policies newsFor more news from Christian Science Monitor, you can click here:
more news from Christian Science MonitorOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us federal policies, you might also like this article about
Biden infrastructure plan. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Bipartisan Infrastructure Law news, infrastructure bill news, news about Us federal policies, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Michigan Infrastructure OfficeChristian Science Monitor
•81% Informative
Bipartisan Infrastructure Law allocated roughly $1.2 trillion for roads, bridges, ports, water, and broadband across the country.
But the political payoff for Democrats in Michigan and other swing states may be close to nothing.
Voters are more focused on inflation, which many economic experts agree this legislation contributed to, but did not cause.
Infrastructure has bipartisan support to Washington , but it may be chronically underfunded by Washington .
The IIJA is the “Bipartisan Infrastructure Law’s ” but a majority in both chambers voted against it.
Some Republicans who voted “no” have attended ribbon-cutting ceremonies for these projects, touting the benefits to their districts.
Some local officials across Michigan say the IIJA cash influx is expediting projects that had previously been put off.
The IIJA program commits $42 billion to help homeowners who have been underserved by private providers because of their income or geography.
The goal is to have all of America connected by 2030 , but funding won't reach specific projects until next year .
Voters often assume that things like smoother roads or better school buses are in the purview of local officials.
VR Score
83
Informative language
80
Neutral language
66
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
48
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
23
Source diversity
21
Affiliate links
no affiliate links