This is a news story, published by Quillette, that relates primarily to John Stuart Mill’s news.
For more John Stuart Mill’s news, you can click here:
more John Stuart Mill’s newsFor more civil rights activism news, you can click here:
more civil rights activism newsFor more news from Quillette, you can click here:
more news from QuilletteOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about civil rights activism, you might also like this article about
free speech. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest free speech law news, unconstitutional censorship news, news about civil rights activism, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
free speech argumentsQuillette
•
49% Informative
Iona Italia : Free speech is our chosen method of resolving disagreements, using words rather than weapons.
Free speech was created under the false notion that words and violence are distinct, but we now know that certain speech is more akin to violence.
Acceptance of freedom of speech is a way to live with genuine conflict among points of view.
The only model that asks nothing of its citizens in terms of learning, autonomy and decision-making is the authoritarian one.
The powerful do well under virtually any system of government. They’re not the ones who need freedom of speech. Its purpose is precisely to protect minority opinions and those unpopular with powerful people.
The phrase is a misquotation of an analogy made in a 1919 Supreme Court opinion that upheld the imprisonment of three people who argued that military conscription was wrong.
John Stuart Mill’s central arguments in On Liberty remain undefeated, including one of his strongest arguments in favour of freedom of speech, of which I have never heard a persuasive refutation.
VR Score
55
Informative language
58
Neutral language
24
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
48
Offensive language
likely offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
long-living
External references
25
Source diversity
16
Affiliate links
4