This is a Wyoming news story, published by New York Post, that relates primarily to Arizona State news.
For more Wyoming news, you can click here:
more Wyoming newsFor more Arizona State news, you can click here:
more Arizona State newsFor more football news, you can click here:
more football newsFor more news from New York Post, you can click here:
more news from New York PostOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best sport news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like football news, you might also like this article about
Texas State prediction. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Texas State defense news, Arizona State news, football news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Texas State OddsNew York Post
•66% Informative
Arizona State is 2 -0 after a 40 -point win over Wyoming and a touchdown victory over Mississippi State .
The two teams meet Thursday night in a nonconference game in San Marcos , Texas .
The Bobcats returned nine starters from a 2023 offense that averaged 37 points per game ( 11th nationally) and ranked 15th nationally in Success Rate ( 48% ) Arizona State’s defense doesn’t look to be improved.
I’m unsure if Arizona State can do anything but ground and pound behind Skattebo in a potentially poor matchup. Pick: Texas State +1.5 (-112, DraftKings ).
VR Score
71
Informative language
73
Neutral language
18
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
37
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links