This is a news story, published by The Atlantic, that relates primarily to Julian Zelizer news.
For more Julian Zelizer news, you can click here:
more Julian Zelizer newsFor more Us federal elections news, you can click here:
more Us federal elections newsFor more news from The Atlantic, you can click here:
more news from The AtlanticOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us federal elections, you might also like this article about
presidential debate. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest serious cognitive dysfunction news, cognitive health news, news about Us federal elections, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
rigorous neuropsychiatric evaluationThe Atlantic
•
70% Informative
Julian Zelizer : The presidential debate was an excellent real-world test of candidates' cognitive fitness.
He says Donald Trump displayed striking patterns that are commonly seen among people in cognitive decline.
Zelizer says the debate is a more demanding and representative test of cognitive health than a simple mental-status exam.
Trump ’s speech during the debate was repetitive not only in form but also in content.
People tend to stick to familiar topics over and over when they experience an impairment in cognitive functioning, for instance, in short-term memory.
Even in cases where Trump could have reasonably defended himself, he was unable to articulate basic exculpatory evidence.
VR Score
74
Informative language
71
Neutral language
59
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
51
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
2
Source diversity
2
Affiliate links
no affiliate links