This is a news story, published by USA Today, that relates primarily to Donald Trump news.
For more Donald Trump news, you can click here:
more Donald Trump newsFor more Us campaigns & elections news, you can click here:
more Us campaigns & elections newsFor more news from USA Today, you can click here:
more news from USA TodayOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us campaigns & elections, you might also like this article about
failure Trump. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Harris news, better politician news, news about Us campaigns & elections, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
chance TrumpUSA Today
•
67% Informative
Donald Trump failed to meet the very low standard Republicans have set for their candidate.
A better politician could have competently countered Kamala Harris' attacks.
But Trump is not a good politician, so Republicans are stuck with their worst possible electoral option.
Trump 's advantage was low expectations, but he still failed.
Trump sounded out of his element going back to debating opponents capable of hitting back. It was Trump 's responsibility to make Harris defend her ridiculous positions, not that of the moderators, and he failed to do so. And he continued to fail at being a good representative for conservatives. Dace Potas is an opinion columnist for USA TODAY and a graduate of DePaul University with a degree in political science..
VR Score
69
Informative language
66
Neutral language
21
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
47
Offensive language
likely offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
9
Affiliate links
no affiliate links