This is a news story, published by The Daily Beast, that relates primarily to Julian Zelizer news.
For more Julian Zelizer news, you can click here:
more Julian Zelizer newsFor more boxing news, you can click here:
more boxing newsFor more news from The Daily Beast, you can click here:
more news from The Daily BeastOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best sport news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like boxing news, you might also like this article about
presidential debate. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest best presidential debate performance news, chief Taylor Swift news, boxing news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Kamala HarrisThe Daily Beast
•56% Informative
Julian Zelizer : If you saw the debate, it was clear to you that Trump failed and Harris triumphed.
But if you tuned into the MAGA broadcasting companies or followed MAGA voices, you got a different story, Zelizer says.
He says Kamala Harris won the debate by every conceivable metric you could imagine.
John Avlon : Some in the media use a term to describe people susceptible to the MAGA spin or to Trump lies.
He says Trump 's real base is not low-information voters, it's no-information people who simply do not want to hear about the world as it is.
They know Trump will deliver the tax cut or culture war initiative they support and so they're for him whether he is an incompetent, criminal, menace or not.
Avlon says Tuesday was an important landmark in this election campaign.
VR Score
65
Informative language
66
Neutral language
25
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
49
Offensive language
likely offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links