This is a OpenAI news story, published by Wired, that relates primarily to Hume AI news.
For more OpenAI news, you can click here:
more OpenAI newsFor more Hume AI news, you can click here:
more Hume AI newsFor more Ai startups news, you can click here:
more Ai startups newsFor more news from Wired, you can click here:
more news from WiredOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best tech news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Ai startups, you might also like this article about
empathic voice interface. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest humanlike voice interfaces news, emotional technologies news, news about Ai startups, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
AI assistantsWired
•70% Informative
A new “empathic voice interface” launched today by a New York startup, Hume AI , makes it possible to add emotionally expressive voices to large language models from Anthropic, Google, Meta, Mistral , and OpenAI .
WIRED tested Hume ’s latest voice technology, called EVI 2 , and found its output to be similar to that developed by OpenAI for ChatGPT.
Even if there is no real feeling behind the bot, there may be risks to playing with users’ emotions.
OpenAI has said it is proceeding carefully with ChatGPT’s voice interface, conducting research to determine how addictive or persuasive the interface might turn out to be.
VR Score
57
Informative language
50
Neutral language
38
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
60
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
medium-lived
External references
11
Source diversity
11
Affiliate links
no affiliate links