This is a news story, published by Good Law Project, that relates primarily to Richard Smith news.
For more Richard Smith news, you can click here:
more Richard Smith newsFor more United kingdom politics news, you can click here:
more United kingdom politics newsFor more news from Good Law Project, you can click here:
more news from Good Law ProjectOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best world news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about United kingdom politics, you might also like this article about
right wing charities. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest charity news, Charity Commission news, news about United kingdom politics, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Street FoundationGood Law Project
•
70% Informative
Street Foundation has given rightwing pressure groups 749,000 more than 40% of the money it handed out in the last five years .
The foundation says it makes grants to advance health, tackle disability and save lives.
But it has been supporting think-tanks that cast doubt on the legitimacy of mental health issues and call for the abolition of disability benefits.
Charity Commission continues to force hardworking taxpayers to fund political activity and misinformation through its disinclination to regulate right wing charities, Maugham said.
“And diverting money away from disabled children is a new low.” The Street Foundation , Richard Smith and the HR Smith Group , the New Culture Forum , the Institute for Economic Affairs , Civitas , and the Global Warming Policy Foundation did not respond to requests for comment.
VR Score
64
Informative language
58
Neutral language
23
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
63
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
10
Source diversity
9
Affiliate links
no affiliate links