This is a the United States news story, published by MSN, that relates primarily to CFIUS news.
For more the United States news, you can click here:
more the United States newsFor more Asia business & economics news, you can click here:
more Asia business & economics newsFor more news from MSN, you can click here:
more news from MSNOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best business news, entertainment news, world news, and much more. If you like this article about Asia business & economics, you might also like this article about
top Nippon Steel executive. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Nippon Steel news, biggest steelmaker news, news about Asia business & economics, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Japanese steelmakerReuters
•
73% Informative
Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States ( CFIUS ) told Nippon Steel and U.S. target it had identified a potential national security risk.
Committee has the power to block foreign acquisitions on national security grounds.
Japanese steelmaker hoped it could still win approval for the deal by patiently explaining its business merits, sources say.
U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel top executives were not on the list of more than 200 guests released by the White House in April .
CFIUS letter argued the transaction posed a risk without offering any discussion of ways to assuage officials' concerns.
The companies began frantically drafting a response, correcting what they perceived as factual inaccuracies and proposing mitigation.
VR Score
83
Informative language
88
Neutral language
38
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
58
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links