This is a Ohio news story, published by WRAL, that relates primarily to J.D. Vance news.
For more Ohio news, you can click here:
more Ohio newsFor more J.D. Vance news, you can click here:
more J.D. Vance newsFor more labor activism news, you can click here:
more labor activism newsFor more news from WRAL, you can click here:
more news from WRALOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about labor activism, you might also like this article about
higher tariffs. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Trump tariffs news, fewer tariffs news, news about labor activism, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
aggressive tariffsWRAL
•
87% Informative
Ohio Sen. J.D. Vance , R- Ohio , says tariffs raise costs for consumers.
Vance : "I think economists really disagree about the effects of tariffs" The idea behind imposing tariffs is to make American companies more competitive with their foreign counterparts.
But real-world examples of tariffs working as intended are rare, economists say.
A 2019 study for the National Bureau of Economic Research found the costs of Trump ’s tariff fell entirely on domestic consumers.
A 2020 UCLA study calculated consumer losses of $51 billion from Trump tariffs through 2019 .
There is little disagreement on this question among credentialed economists, according to surveys.
VR Score
92
Informative language
94
Neutral language
33
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
59
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
9
Source diversity
9
Affiliate links
no affiliate links