This is a news story, published by The Hill, that relates primarily to Jeffery Goldberg news.
For more Jeffery Goldberg news, you can click here:
more Jeffery Goldberg newsFor more Us federal elections news, you can click here:
more Us federal elections newsFor more news from The Hill, you can click here:
more news from The HillOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us federal elections, you might also like this article about
Kamala Harris. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Dana Bash news, credible pollsters news, news about Us federal elections, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Democratic presidential nominee Kamala HarrisThe Hill
•
65% Informative
Atlantic editor-in-chief Jeffery Goldberg and National Public Radio senior political editor Domenico Montanaro argued that Kamala Harris is unfairly held to a higher standard than her opponent, Republican nominee Donald Trump .
The point was completely lost on Goldberg : Trump riffed about the inefficiency of green energy, including wind, and correlation between clean energy mandates and the cost of groceries, including bacon.
There is a double standard in how these candidates are treated by NPR , says Julian Zelizer .
Zelizer: The way NPR fudged the numbers evinces bias and a political agenda.
He says there is no reason to bloat a Trump fact-check with filler with filler; it's just Democratic Party rapid response.
VR Score
67
Informative language
63
Neutral language
11
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
40
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
7
Source diversity
6
Affiliate links
no affiliate links