This is a EV news story, published by Only Good News Daily, that relates primarily to Stanford news.
For more EV news, you can click here:
more EV newsFor more consumer electronics news, you can click here:
more consumer electronics newsFor more news from Only Good News Daily, you can click here:
more news from Only Good News DailyOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best tech news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like consumer electronics news, you might also like this article about
EV battery news. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest battery manufacturing news, Stanford Battery Center news, consumer electronics news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
EV battery makersOnly Good News Daily
•
67% Informative
Stanford researchers have found that EV battery makers have been making a fundamental mistake at the outset.
The team took aim at the common wisdom for battery manufacturing, which says that factories should hold a newly made lithium-ion battery for an initial charge lasting 10 hours at low current before setting it loose.
The purpose is - or was - to reduce the loss of lithium up front, thereby increasing the lifespan of the battery.
Not so, the researchers discovered. They flipped the script and purposefully charged the batteries on a high current for just 20 minutes .
They lost quite a bit of lithium but gained an average improvement of 50 percent in EV battery lifespan.
VR Score
66
Informative language
68
Neutral language
34
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
54
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
1
Source diversity
1
Affiliate links
no affiliate links