This is a news story, published by MSN, that relates primarily to Cui news.
For more Cui news, you can click here:
more Cui newsFor more consumer electronics news, you can click here:
more consumer electronics newsFor more news from MSN, you can click here:
more news from MSNOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best tech news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like consumer electronics news, you might also like this article about
Battery manufacturing. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest battery chemistries news, Stanford Battery Center report news, consumer electronics news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
battery informatics teamTechXplore
•
87% Informative
Researchers at the SLAC- Stanford Battery Center report that giving batteries this first charge at unusually high currents increased their average lifespan by 50% .
The researchers were able to use scientific machine learning to pinpoint specific changes in the battery electrodes that account for this increase in lifespan and performance.
The study was carried out by a SLAC/ Stanford team led by Professor Will Chueh.
Removing more lithium ions up front frees up headspace in the positive electrode and allows the electrode to cycle in a more efficient way, improving subsequent performance.
"Brute force optimization by trial-and-error is routine in manufacturing how should we perform the first charge, and what is the winning combination of factors?" said Cui .
VR Score
90
Informative language
92
Neutral language
46
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
58
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
long-living
External references
4
Source diversity
4
Affiliate links
no affiliate links