This is a news story, published by Guardian, that relates primarily to Brazilla Carroll Reece news.
For more Brazilla Carroll Reece news, you can click here:
more Brazilla Carroll Reece newsFor more Us political corruption news, you can click here:
more Us political corruption newsFor more news from Guardian, you can click here:
more news from GuardianOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us political corruption, you might also like this article about
Democratic party. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Democrats news, Democratic presidential candidate news, news about Us political corruption, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Democrat partyGuardian
•67% Informative
The former president is adopting a jibe that’s been around since at least the 1940s .
Opponents of the party long ago decided, for some reason, that this brutal act of syllabic denial would shame their opponents.
The term first came to prominence in 1946 thanks to a congressman named Brazilla Carroll Reece , who headed the Republican National Committee .
Removing the ic” does seem to suggest the party isn’t about democracy.
But if that’s the goal, Glickman wonders: “Why not call it the undemocratic party? Like Trump used to say the Department of Injustice ”.
VR Score
67
Informative language
63
Neutral language
13
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
45
Offensive language
likely offensive
Hate speech
possibly hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
16
Source diversity
13
Affiliate links
no affiliate links