Free Speech Advocates Criticized
This is a news story, published by The Spectator, that relates primarily to Yvette Cooper news.
Yvette Cooper news
For more Yvette Cooper news, you can click here:
more Yvette Cooper newsNews about human rights
For more human rights news, you can click here:
more human rights newsThe Spectator news
For more news from The Spectator, you can click here:
more news from The SpectatorAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best world news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about human rights, you might also like this article about
Free speech. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest vexatious police reports news, racial hatred news, news about human rights, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Free speech advocatesThe Spectator
•Labour’s backwards steps on free speech
58% Informative
Yvette Cooper has said trying to get the police to record fewer non-crime hate incidents’ (NCHIs) was a dreadful mistake.
The College of Policing said such acts should always be recorded as NCHIs, even if there’s zero evidence that the perp was in fact motivated by hatred.
The perception of the victim, or indeed a third party, is all that matters.
Having an NCHI recorded against your name has serious consequences, because it can show up in an enhanced criminal record check and prevent you getting a job.
VR Score
59
Informative language
57
Neutral language
33
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
57
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links