Labour's Defence Budget Promises Unrealized
This is a news story, published by UK Defence Journal, that relates primarily to Rachel Reeves news.
Rachel Reeves news
For more Rachel Reeves news, you can click here:
more Rachel Reeves newsNews about United kingdom politics
For more United kingdom politics news, you can click here:
more United kingdom politics newsUK Defence Journal news
For more news from UK Defence Journal, you can click here:
more news from UK Defence JournalAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best world news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about United kingdom politics, you might also like this article about
defence spending. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Labour manifesto news, UK Defence Journal news, news about United kingdom politics, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
defence financesUK Defence Journal
•UK ‘atrophying its armed forces’ says former tank commander
59% Informative
Labour manifesto promised to increase defence spending to 2.5% of GDP from 2.2% .
Now we learn that, faced with the reality of government finances, Chancellor Rachel Reeves is having to look at some hard and probably unpopular choices.
MoD faces further deep cuts to its budget for modernising the armed forces of up to 20% .
VR Score
63
Informative language
62
Neutral language
34
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
47
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links