Voters Question AI's Impact on Elections
This is a UK news story, published by Guardian, that relates primarily to Taylor Swift news.
UK news
For more UK news, you can click here:
more UK newsTaylor Swift news
For more Taylor Swift news, you can click here:
more Taylor Swift newsNews about Us federal elections
For more Us federal elections news, you can click here:
more Us federal elections newsGuardian news
For more news from Guardian, you can click here:
more news from GuardianAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us federal elections, you might also like this article about
AI content. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest AI images news, US voters news, news about Us federal elections, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
AIGuardian
•Republican voters less confident than Democrats in spotting AI deepfakes, poll shows
73% Informative
Only one in four registered voters have strong confidence in their ability to tell the difference between real and AI -generated visual content, according to new research.
Members of both parties don’t want their candidates tweeting synthetic media.
Survey was commissioned by UK -based research firm Savanta in response to a Guardian story about the origins of Taylor Swift deepfakes by Donald Trump .
VR Score
75
Informative language
75
Neutral language
14
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
71
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
3
Source diversity
2
Affiliate links
no affiliate links