This is a San Francisco City news story, published by Wired, that relates primarily to David Chiu news.
For more San Francisco City news, you can click here:
more San Francisco City newsFor more David Chiu news, you can click here:
more David Chiu newsFor more Ai policy and regulations news, you can click here:
more Ai policy and regulations newsFor more news from Wired, you can click here:
more news from WiredOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best tech news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Ai policy and regulations, you might also like this article about
nonconsensual deepfake pornography. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest deepfake pornography news, nonconsensual deepfake porn news, news about Ai policy and regulations, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
nonconsensual deepfake legislationWired
•
75% Informative
Thirty-nine states have introduced a hodgepodge of laws designed to deter the creation of nonconsensual deepfakes and punish those who make and share them.
Last month , San Francisco City Attorney David Chiu ’s office announced a lawsuit against 16 of the most visited websites that allow users to create AI -generated pornography.
Some states allow for civil and criminal cases to be brought against perpetrators, while others might only provide for one of the two .
In many cases, laws require proving intent, that the goal of the person making and sharing the nonconsensual deepfake was to harm its subject.
Only a federal law would allow for interstate investigations and prosecutions.
VR Score
72
Informative language
67
Neutral language
58
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
58
Offensive language
likely offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
9
Source diversity
9
Affiliate links
no affiliate links