This is a news story, published by ProPublica, that relates primarily to Thomas news.
For more Thomas news, you can click here:
more Thomas newsFor more SCOTUS news, you can click here:
more SCOTUS newsFor more news from ProPublica, you can click here:
more news from ProPublicaOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about SCOTUS, you might also like this article about
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest First Liberty plaintiff news, Supreme Court reform news, news about SCOTUS, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
former First Liberty attorneyProPublica
•71% Informative
Ginni Thomas wrote that First Liberty’s opposition to court-reform proposals gave a boost to certain judges.
Thomas wrote in all caps: “YOU GUYS HAVE FILLED THE SAILS OF MANY JUDGES. CAN I JUST TELL YOU, THANK YOU SO, SO, so much” On a July 31 private call with donors, Kelly Shackelford read Thomas ’ email aloud on a call.
On the same call, he attacked Justice Elena Kagan as “treasonous” and “disloyal” after she endorsed an ethics code.
The push to change how the court functions grew after a series of ProPublica stories showed that wealthy Republican donors have showered Thomas and Alito with free gifts and travel that they failed to disclose.
First Liberty has been at the forefront of a decadeslong and successful effort to expand the First Amendment rights of religious groups.
ProPublica stands behind all of the stories in its “ Friends of the Court ” series.
Donors do not have access to stories ahead of their publication, and they have no say over coverage decisions.
Shackelford: "This is a spiritual battle. The evil that will occur if we lose the rule of law is beyond.. what any of us can even think through".
VR Score
74
Informative language
76
Neutral language
52
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
51
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
16
Source diversity
9
Affiliate links
no affiliate links