Judge Reed O'Connor: Joke

This is a news story, published by Above the Law, that relates primarily to Musk news.

Musk news

For more Musk news, you can click here:

more Musk news

News about SCOTUS

For more SCOTUS news, you can click here:

more SCOTUS news

Above the Law news

For more news from Above the Law, you can click here:

more news from Above the Law

About the Otherweb

Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about SCOTUS, you might also like this article about

Supreme Court

. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest recent case Musk news, new judge news, news about SCOTUS, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!

Judge Reed

Above the Law

•

Judge Reed O’Connor recused himself from a case involving Elon Musk because he owned Tesla stock

Summary

Nutrition label

57% Informative

Judge Reed O’Connor has spent his tenure striking down Obamacare and getting overturned by the Supreme Court .

O'Connor recused himself from the case after it emerged that he owned a sizable amount of Tesla stock.

Media Matters , the liberal media watchdog that Musk sued, also raised Tesla as an interested party to their case in a roundabout bid to get a new judge.

Musk claims Media Matters wronged him when it pointed out that X served them name-brand advertisements next to white nationalist posts.

Musk ’s argument is that this is tortious interference because Media Matters had to manufacture a unique profile to trigger these circumstances.

Media Matters proved, through whatever means, that these safeguards were not thorough and even if advertisers acted on that specific revelation, it cannot not be characterized as an “intent to deceive” since the claim turned out to be True.

VR Score

Informative language

Neutral language

Article tone

semi-formal

Language

English

Language complexity

Offensive language

not offensive

Hate speech

not hateful