This is a news story, published by Above the Law, that relates primarily to Musk news.
For more Musk news, you can click here:
more Musk newsFor more SCOTUS news, you can click here:
more SCOTUS newsFor more news from Above the Law, you can click here:
more news from Above the LawOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about SCOTUS, you might also like this article about
Supreme Court. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest recent case Musk news, new judge news, news about SCOTUS, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Judge ReedAbove the Law
•
57% Informative
Judge Reed O’Connor has spent his tenure striking down Obamacare and getting overturned by the Supreme Court .
O'Connor recused himself from the case after it emerged that he owned a sizable amount of Tesla stock.
Media Matters , the liberal media watchdog that Musk sued, also raised Tesla as an interested party to their case in a roundabout bid to get a new judge.
Musk claims Media Matters wronged him when it pointed out that X served them name-brand advertisements next to white nationalist posts.
Musk ’s argument is that this is tortious interference because Media Matters had to manufacture a unique profile to trigger these circumstances.
Media Matters proved, through whatever means, that these safeguards were not thorough and even if advertisers acted on that specific revelation, it cannot not be characterized as an “intent to deceive” since the claim turned out to be True.
VR Score
44
Informative language
36
Neutral language
51
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
54
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
14
Source diversity
13
Affiliate links
no affiliate links